Democrats and Blacks – A Partnership of Convenience

Racism is wrong and I oppose any form of it, but that goes both ways.

I know many Black Americans who have already turned on Obama and his administration. But those are Americans who work hard for a living and disagree just like me with what is going on. The interesting part is that those Black Americans opposing are slandered by their own people. Today they are heroes for the black community, but as soon as they criticize the community organizers and self proclaimed civil rights activists they are given “names” and vilified.

Democrats and the current Obama administration are measuring with two sets of standards, one for them (everything is allowed) and one for the rest of America.

This is what Democrats really think about the Blacks – how they really feel about them.

John F. Kennedy refused to support the “Discrimination Act” in the early 60’s proposed by the Republicans until he ran for Presidency and needed their support. Right away he was all fired up about Civil Rights.

Bill Clinton won his Presidential election primarily with the help from minorities and because he had the blacks on his side. Even worse, after his final term he opened up an office in New York’s Harlem district (the Black Community) on Tax Dollars, where still nobody really knows what he’s doing there; but in his words he’s there to increase the value of the Black Community.

Ted “I am a walking handbook for law review and criminal justice” Kennedy acted as the advocate for minorities his entire career. The exploitation of minorities is a much better description – His agenda was always a self-serving one – Keeping the focus off of his own family’s lethal behavior. The truth is the Kennedy’s are a family of Elite thinkers. If you are not an Ivy Leaguer, Millionaire or belong to an affluent family you would not come anywhere near those individuals. Not that any person of sense would want to.

Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and all of the other self-proclaimed and self-righteous humanitarians claim that all they care about is the poor and the minorities.

Now, what have all those self-righteous Democrats have in common?

They are hypocrites to an extent. Because this is what they really think about the Blacks – (from Ann Coulters Colum):

The recently released book Game Change reports that Sen. Harry Reid said America would vote for Barack Obama because he was a “light-skinned” African-American “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”


The book also says Bill Clinton called Sen. Ted Kennedy to ask for his endorsement of Hillary over Obama, saying of Obama: “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.” (http://is.gd/6eTGU)

But where is the outrage? Where are the protests? Where are Reverend Wright, Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson?  Why aren’t the Democrats screaming out in outrage?

Where are the riots on the street, destroying half a city and private property, just to use afterwards “Racism” as a defense weapon to avoid prosecution and retaliation for all the damage? (See the Rodney King case)

Where is “No Drama Obama” calling this “Stupid” just as he did with the Cambridge police officer for doing nothing but his job according to the rules and regulations?

Nowhere – and I tell you why:

YOU DO NOT BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU

Just imagine if a Conservative would have made the same remarks – the streets would be a battlefield, Al Sharpton would be on TV and nowhere else, we would never hear the end of it, the Democrats would demand that the conservative step down, and BarryO would be furious.

It is a win- win situation for the both of them, Democrats and Black Civil Rights Activists.

  • The Democrats know that the only Hispanics supporting them are the immigration activists because as soon as the immigrant is naturalized, the majority of them vote Conservative (because they have to work hard to prosper). The Atheists and other minorities don’t make up enough of the numbers to win any election so without the blacks the democrats would not win a flowerpot.

So the Democrats act as Humanitarians, make major financial promises to the black Ghetto Communities (educated and working Black Americans move away from there as fast as they can), promising all the freebees and hope to gain their vote.

  • And the black Civil Rights Activists know very well that sooner or later the conservative Leaders will have to appeal to the demands of their voters and stop financial giveaways, special treatment, affirmative action’s, quote regulations, discrimination of whites, and their right to free speech and other racism, hatred, and anger producing nonsense.

Bottom Line is – the relationship between the Democrats and the Black Civil Rights Activists is that of a “partnership of convenience”.

Obama himself is silent because he needs Harry Reid. Without Reid and Pelosi there is no Healthcare Bill.

And the blacks Civil Rights activists, Obama’s Shamrock of Racism”, need Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to push the healthcare bill through in order to get a Rolls Royce of Medical Treatment without paying extra insurance. Let’s be honest those are the largest recipients.


Harry Reid needs to go – right now and not when the Healthcare Bill is signed and the country is financially destroyed, and with him Obama and his entire racist Czars.

© by Tom Lehner

19 responses

  1. progressivescholar | Reply

    This post sounds to me like you’re using the Democrats’ past actions as an excuse for black people’s behavior.

    In your words: “Always living in the past and using history as excuse does not get us anywhere in the future. We should learn from the past and not using it as excuse.”

    If you don’t believe in using the past as an excuse, how do you rationalize this post?

  2. progressivescholar | Reply

    “Bill Clinton won his Presidential election primarily with the help from minorities and because he had the blacks on his side. Even worse, after his final term he opened up an office in New York’s Harlem district (the Black Community) on Tax Dollars, where still nobody really knows what he’s doing there; but in his words he’s there to increase the value of the Black Community.

    Ted “I am a walking handbook for law review and criminal justice” Kennedy acted as the advocate for minorities his entire career. The exploitation of minorities is a much better description – His agenda was always a self-serving one – Keeping the focus off of his own family’s lethal behavior. The truth is the Kennedy’s are a family of Elite thinkers. If you are not an Ivy Leaguer, Millionaire or belong to an affluent family you would not come anywhere near those individuals. Not that any person of sense would want to.”

    I don’t see any evidence that Clinton’s office in Harlem is “even worse”, or Kennedy’s advocacy was “self-serving”. Please use fact and research to prove these assumptions, if you want people to take your assertions seriously.

    “The Democrats know that the only Hispanics supporting them are the immigration activists because as soon as the immigrant is naturalized, the majority of them vote Conservative (because they have to work hard to prosper). The Atheists and other minorities don’t make up enough of the numbers to win any election so without the blacks the democrats would not win a flowerpot.”

    Can you point me to your source for this information? Or like most of your “facts”, did you just make it up?

    Are you inferring that the only people who vote for Democrats are atheists and black people? Where is your source for this information? These “facts” of yours surprise me because the last time I checked:

    -immigrants who are not yet citizens cannot vote
    -67% of Latinos/Hispanics voted for Obama
    -43% of white people voted for Obama (not 0%, as you would have people believe)
    -62% of Asian-Americans voted for Obama
    -9% of Republicans voted for Obama
    -60% of people who consider themselves “moderate” voted for Obama
    -78% of Jewish people voted for Obama
    -45% of Protestant people voted for Obama
    -54% of Catholic people voted for Obama
    -43% of people who attend religious services more than once a week voted for Obama
    -49% of Catholics who attend weekly religious services voted for Obama
    -32% of Protestants who attend weekly religious services voted for Obama
    -24% of White Evangelical/Born-again Christians voted for Obama
    -55% of people who work full-time voted for Obama
    -44% of our men and women in the military voted for Obama
    -45% of people living in rural areas voted for Obama

    So, tell me again where you found that only blacks and atheists voted for Obama?

    Source:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26843704

  3. progressivescholar | Reply

    “So the Democrats act as Humanitarians”,

    Yes they do, a lot more often than Republicans. And Jesus said, “Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you.”

    “black Ghetto Communities (educated and working Black Americans move away from there as fast as they can)”

    Once again I’m amazed at your capacity to have met every black person who has ever lived in a “black Ghetto Community”. How long did it take you to meet every one of them and come to the conclusion that only the educated and hard-working black people move away from there? And I’m assuming you’ve met every one of the people still living there, to analyze their intelligence and work ethic compared to the people who have left. You are one busy man!

  4. progressivescholar | Reply

    “So the Democrats act as Humanitarians”,

    Yes they do, a lot more often than Republicans.

    And Jesus said, “Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you.”

    Jesus said, “Do not judge so that you will not be judged. For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you.”

    Jesus said, “Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, “Let me take the speck out of your eye,” and behold, the log is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.”

    Jesus said, “In everything, therefore, treat people the same way you want them to treat you, for this is the Law and the Prophets.”

    Jesus said, “No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.”

    …and you think Democrats are bad for being humanitarian? How do you believe in Jesus’ teachings and not see that it is hypocritical to say what you’re saying?

    “black Ghetto Communities (educated and working Black Americans move away from there as fast as they can)”

    Once again I’m amazed at your capacity to have met every black person who has ever lived in a “black Ghetto Community”. How long did it take you to meet every one of them and come to the conclusion that only the educated and hard-working black people move away from there? And I’m assuming you’ve met every one of the people still living there, to analyze their intelligence and work ethic compared to the people who have left. You are one busy man!

    1. praisecreator | Reply

      “So the Democrats act as Humanitarians” – “Act” is the opperative word here. I don’t consider giving for your own glory as true giving, and I know of so many Republicans that are humanitarians, “True Humanitarians” because they don’t publicize it.

  5. progressivescholar | Reply

    How would you feel if I told you that all the hard-working, educated white people move away from rural areas and farms as fast as they can, and all that’s left in those areas are dumb, lazy white people?

  6. progressivescholar | Reply

    “I don’t consider giving for your own glory as true giving, and I know of so many Republicans that are humanitarians, “True Humanitarians” because they don’t publicize it.”

    1. I think it’s God’s decision to decide whether the person is giving for their own glory, or giving out of the goodness of their heart. Unless you’re saying that you have God’s divine powers?

    2. Please give me the names of those Republicans, and the causes they have contributed to.

    3. How do you know those Republicans are “true humanitarians” if they don’t publicize their giving? In other words, how do you know about something that isn’t publicized?

    1. 1) What do you mean by give me the name, almost every Republican goes to church and donates his tenth which is be used to support those in need in the community and done come up with any nonsense again I know because I am there.

      2) We all have at least once charit project we are participating, and more.

      We dont have the need like the dems to donate only when the press is anywhere nearby and put our heart on a flag, we jsut do,

      1. OH and you want causes, well I am giving you causes, three out of my own:

        1) Childrens cancer fund
        2) Make a wish foundation
        3) Veterans affairs
        4) Local CPS homes (and guess who is the majority in there)
        5) once a month I have between 10 and 20 children of the very same home on my ranch for one reason only: To give those unfortunate kids a beautiful day with horses and animals – jsut to be happy and get out.

      2. progressivescholar

        It’s very interesting how you are avoiding the rest of my challenges to your “facts” and only focusing on this.

        Okay, so you say that “almost” every Republican goes to church and donates his “tenth” to that church. How do you know this? Do you have proof? On the same note, do you have proof that Democrats do not do this?

        You say “I know because I am there”, does this mean that all Republicans go to the same church, in the same city? That would be pretty unbelievable to me.

        Here are some facts that go against your assumption:

        1. Sarah and Todd Palin gave $4,880 to charity in 2006 and $3,325 in 2007. That is 1.5 percent of their 2007 income and 3.3 percent in 2006. That’s not 10%.
        2. In 2005 and 2006, the Clinton and Bush families each gave 10% of their income to charity. Both families were in the national spotlight during those years – one could argue that Bush had more to gain from being charitable than the Clintons. Why should the Clinton’s giving be hailed as “true humanitarian” while the Clintons are demonized?

      3. What Praiscreator ment was there is a huge difference between tighting (10% or as Jesus said: Bring the tides into the storehouse) and an offering. The Palins charitable donations are considered offerings.

        And on top of that all politicians have to publicise is their charitable donations and not their church tighting. there is a major differnce.

      4. progressivescholar

        You and President Obama have a lot in common then. More than a third of his 2008 giving was directed toward Human Services charities and 25% went to Health charities.

        Obama donated to these organizations, for example:
        Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
        CARE
        Direct Relief International

        So, there is proof that Obama is giving to charities. There is proof that he is not just giving to charities who will help him win elections. There is proof that he is participating in more than one charity project. And there is proof that he is donating when there is no press nearby.

        He is just one Democrat among thousands that also give charitably when there are no cameras around.

        I encourage you to use some of the compassion you obviously have, and consider that not everyone you disagree with has bad intentions. Democrats are not bad people, they just have different goals than you do. Why do you insist on creating more anger and division in this world?

      5. Thank you for your encouragement, of course we dont have the numbers of all republicand BECASUE WE DONT MAKE IT PUBLIC did you get it now? We are not like the dems who make this in front of the TV to look good and bragg about how many black or asian or hispanic friends we have. I dont ensist to create anger – in 1009 days my peacful time starts becasue than when senseble people like the conservatives go back and fix all that nonsense the dems produce

      6. progressivescholar

        Actually, all elected politicians are required to make their income tax statements public, which includes the amount given to charitable groups.

        This is how I knew about the specific donation amounts that Obama, Bush, Clinton and Palin gave.

      7. I do not care how much one politicians spends I did not talk about politicians I talked about conservaitves in General. Of course not all give and of course I know that some even Dems spend some money I am aware of that. we are talking in general and not about specific persons.

      8. progressivescholar

        We’re not talking about specific persons? Now you’re contradicting yourself. In this post alone you mentioned John F. Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and Ted Kennedy in reference to their charitable efforts. I believe these are all politicians, and you talked about all of them in detail.

  7. progressivescholar | Reply

    Earlier you said, “almost every Republican goes to church and donates his tenth which is be used to support those in need in the community”. Now you’re saying that there’s a huge difference between “offering” and “tighting”, and that Palin’s 3-4% donation is an “offering” rather than a “tighting”.

    I’m very confused as to the difference between the two. If your tenth is only going to the church, how is it considered a charitable donation to those in need in the community?

    1. praisecreator | Reply

      Are you kidding me? There is a difference between a “tithe” and an “offering”. Tithing is giving 1/10 (10%) of your income to the Lord (Mostly done at church). Any giving above that is an Offering – Above and beyond what the Lord requires. This is a very simple principle.

  8. Thanks for posting this it was note for a paper I am now writing for my thesis. Thanks

    Gucci Sneakers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: