Marriage Punishment Tax – How the Godless Liberals are going to destroy the family

Marriage/Wedding day – a Holy Sacrament given to us by God Almighty in Heaven and Jesus Christ our Savior:

Millions of young girls play wedding with their Barbie dolls and millions plan their wedding day during their teenage years. Mothers save their wedding gowns hoping that their daughter will wear it, some of the gowns have been past down from mother to daughter for centuries. Fathers give their final advice to their sons in how to be a good husband.

Yes, even I have my dream as of how I want my wedding to be conducted.

And when finally the big day is here, and all seems to be so perfect, there is no greater happiness and joy in the air.

The man waiting in anticipation flanked by his best friend and on this day his best man. The family in fine arranged chairs, all in fine attire to honor the loving couple on this most beautiful day, the eyes of the brides groom wide open as she walks in, all in white, as beautiful as the Stars over Texas, escorted by her father, the guests of honor raise and Mendelssohn’s “A Midsummer night dream” tunes in. Flower arrangements smell like a spring breeze. Little children walk ahead of the bride and spread flowers on the floor seaming the walk of the bride. The Minister holds a ceremony and in the end when the words “I DO” are spoken he introduces for the first time “Mr. and Mrs. Smith”. White doves fly toward heaven. A dream comes true for every woman, most men, and a moment driving tears in the eyes of mothers who become mother-in-law at this moment.

This is the happiest day in life for a loving couple.

Away from the romantic side: The Wedding industry is a multi Billion Dollar industry and thousands of members of the professional wedding guild is depending on it.

Godless liberals and their political excrescent the Democrats are very well known for being hateful to everything that is traditional, and honorable. But now they are going too far because now they are attacking the smallest cell of a functioning society – the family – in order to promote the immoral lifestyle of Gay couples, Feminists, and people who live in so called “Wild Relationships” to avoid commitment in order to keep the opportunity of have changing sexual partners.



In his new Healthcare bill it will be certain that in order to finance this nonsense you have to attack the one group in the country that holds the majority. And one way to finance this bill is: the Marriage punishment Tax.

Yes my dear readers – MARRIAGE PUNISHMENT Tax.

In his new Healthcare bull, Obama plans on a more than 60% higher coverage for Married Couples. Couples just living together pay more than 60% less (

But what is Obama thinking?

As of here I can only give you a personal guess, because in my mind there is no sense whatsoever in taxing people who live an honorable, committed life in the Spirit of God.

Three groups of Citizens are going to benefit from this Tax:

  • Single moms and dads with single incomes to support their family – this is the one group of beneficiaries I would agree need additional support. But that support could be given in a different way, for example by issuing a cut on the healthcare cost.

However, sooner or later most singles find a new partner and fall in love again. Now, thanks to Obama those couples will think twice before getting married, giving children a traditional family, and making a commitment to do the right thing, because living together will be a lot cheaper.

Now, don’t the Democrats know what they are doing to the family, the children, and the family values? Is it really worth it to promote the two other minority groups at the expense of the destruction of Marriage?

However, sooner or later most singles find a new partner and fall in love again. Now, thanks to Obama those couples will think twice before getting married, giving children a traditional family, and making a commitment to do the right thing, because living together will be a lot cheaper.

Now, don’t the Democrats know what they are doing to the family, the children, and the family values? Is it really worth it to promote the two other minority groups at the expense of the destruction of Marriage?

And is it really worth it to play “Pay back times” on all the conservative healthcare opposing Citizens who strongly believe in moral family values just because the same people oppose the Health care bill and Abortion?

  • The second group is the feminists. Feminists have been lobbying for decades as the opposition to family values. But feminists are also, next to teenagers the largest group of Abortionists.

And since we reject Abortion and will continue to do so, and Obama is forced one way or the other to take it out of the public funded healthcare, this Marriage tax is on the one end Obama’s payback to the conservatives for losing the Abortion debate and on the other hand a small token from Obama to the feminists, at least, giving them something back.

Bottom line is, since they have to pay for their own Abortion now, Christians, living a moral and traditional lifestyle are punished by higher taxation on the healthcare bill. In that way the feminist can save some money to pay for their Abortion.

  • And last but not least – Gay’s.  One might stand for Gay rights as he/she feels fit. Some oppose, and some propose. I am not going into this discussion as of now, but fact of the matter is that 86% of the Americans reject Gay marriage.

Even the super liberal States like California have voted on an Election Ballot with 86% against Gay Marriages. That makes the Gay’s the third major Group of people “just living together” and a huge beneficiary of Obama’s new Healthcare bill taxation.

Like I said – this is not about gay rights – this is payback time to the 86% of Americans who voted against it.

Do lifestyle minorities really think that punishing the majority of the country will close the gap and produce understanding and acceptance? I doubt it. As a matter of fact the opposite is going to happen – this will backfire and breed resentment. Let’s face it, we the majority will not take this punishment lightly.

Now Obama and his no-good Liberal Czars know for a fact that this won’t change any time soon, but it is still punishment for doing the right thing – getting married and building a traditional family for our future and our children.

Bottom Line is, Obama needs to give something to his ACORN people, to hold them in line for his re-election in 2012, and if that means attacking traditional family values and destroying the traditional family that for Obama is a small price to pay. But for America a huge devastation on everything we the majority, we the people, believe in.

So kiss your dreams of a marriage goodbye, because thanks to Obama every American will think twice before being financially punished by doing the right thing, and sooner or later we will have European conditions where the majority of the households are single households.

MARK MY WORDS – The European Socialist Agenda is in full affect thanks to Obama; and now that he has attacked marriage, in my opinion, the next will be underage drinking and lowering the age of consensual sex, just to make sure our teenagers don’t have anymore limitations and can sleep around – just like the example set to them by the liberals.


But they won’t change my mind – Marriage is a holy sacrament given to me by God Almighty in Heaven and Jesus Christ my Savior.

The day these Immoral and Unethical morons of Liberals are out of office will be a Holiday for America and maybe instead of MLK day we should install a “Free of Obama and his Liberal Bunch Day”.


24 responses

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tom Lehner , Tom Lehner . Tom Lehner said: Marriage Punishment Tax – How the Godless Liberals are going to destroy the family: […]

  2. Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by TomLehner: Marriage Punishment Tax – How the Godless Liberals are going to destroy the family:

  3. progressivescholar | Reply

    A great man once said, “Hate is too great a burden to bear. I have decided to love. If you are seeking the highest good, I think you can find it through love. And the beautiful thing is that we are moving against wrong when we do it, because John was right, God is love. He who hates does not know God, but he who has love has the key that unlocks the door to the meaning of ultimate reality.”

    I believe Jesus taught his followers to love your enemy, did he not? How do you align yourself with Jesus and spew hate all over this blog?

    1. This is my point all along, do you diversity preachers really think you can punish us and make us pay for doing the right thing and than sit back and cry because we are angry? NO I DO NOT HATE – I AM ANGRY – NO I AM PISSED; And if you read my blog really you would see that I pointed exactly this out – those actions Obama and his socialist jerks set are not subject to produce a together but rather produce anger – anger those dumb Dems can use to play the role of a victim – but that aint working no more – we the young ones have the saying now and we dont take it no more.

      1. progressivescholar

        I don’t understand – how am I punishing you, exactly? I have not called you names, I have not harmed you, I have not judged you. What I *have* done is challenge you, present you with facts, and hopefully made you stop to think for a minute about the assertions you are making. None of this is punishment. This is actually what Jesus did, and how he created an entirely new religion. He challenged people to see the danger in the old ways, and taught people to love one another despite differences.

        Did Jesus teach you that it’s okay to call your brothers and sisters “jerks” and “dumb”? That sounds like hatred to me. Love your enemy; an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

      2. Than you really do not understand me at all. First of all yes you did and that was the reason I stoped talking toy ou. in my last blog I pointed out that I am opposing and hate those “white hooded KKK” Idiots and you kept comparing me to them. Jesus was not intending to found a new religion but restoring his fathers (GOD) law – he said I am jewis as my fathers before me. The fact a new religion turned out is a sideeffect of history. You are right we should lvoe and not hate, however I dotn hate people, I respect people who work for living, who work hard to prosper I lvoe and have compassion for people who are against their wrong doing in troubles (See Haiti – a earthquake is not their fault). haiti is a good example: The vicitms have my tears, my donations and my help adn if the gov would allow it I’d even take some for shelter – but those gangs in there shooting against their own people to steel donations deserve only one thing – the rope. that is fact. And if you quote Jesus than let me quote it for you too: Those who work shell eat vs. dont who dont work should not eat (2 Thessalonians 3:10) another one is dont hate the sinner hate the sin. I dont hate gay I hate the lifestyle, I dont have blacks those I know work hard, and moved away from ghettos and dont like the ghettos themselves, they live a good life, care for their families and I am proud to call one or the other my friend. I dont hate I reject there is a major difference. And on a finall note: I did not want to bring it up BUT my chief of wranglers is black the best horsewhisperer I ever employed you do not want to hear waht he says about Ghetto blacks

      3. progressivescholar

        “Those who work shell eat vs. dont who dont work should not eat (2 Thessalonians 3:10)”

        Two thousand years ago when this was written, there were no grocery stores where people could buy food. If you did not collect or grow your food, you would starve. When St. Paul spoke of “working” he meant working to grow or collect food. He did not mean working at McDonalds or WalMart. In modern society this passage has no meaning.

        “dont hat the sinner hate the sin” is not in the Bible, sir. Find the passage and prove me wrong.

        I hear you saying “I respect people who…” and “I have compassion for people who…” – this is conditional respect and compassion. Jesus taught us unconditional respect and compassion (“Let He who is without sin cast the first stone”). You only respect people who act in a way you agree with, and you only have compassion for people who behave in a way you agree with.

        “I dont hate I reject there is a major difference.”

        No, there is no difference really. Jesus did not reject anyone. He did not even reject sinners, prostitutes, or lepers. If someone needed his help, he was there to help them. He did not scold them for being sinners, he did not punish them for making bad decisions. And yet you have this blog to preach a message of rejection to those who disagree with your personal opinion.

      4. praisecreator

        The Holy Bible was written for all “times” You cannot just use verses when it suits you, and the word “work” means just that “work”. You are the definition of a “double standard”.

      5. progressivescholar

        Oh okay, so I am to assume that you also follow all of these rules, which are also found in the Bible:

        -Never work on a Sunday, or be killed (Exodus 35:2)
        -Women cannot be teachers (1 Timothy 2:11-15)
        -It’s a sin to wear clothes made of mixed fibers (Leviticus 19:19)
        -All menstruating women must be in isolation for seven days (Leviticus 20:18)
        -Any man who is near a naked menstruating woman must be “cut off from their people” (Leviticus 20:18)
        -It is a sin to eat pork, shrimp, lobster, or any shellfish (Leviticus 11:7-12)

        If you adhere to all of these rules, “praisecreator”, I really admire you! But just in case you don’t, I accept your apology for saying that I am a “double standard”. 🙂

      6. progressivescholar

        Here’s some more Bible verses that I’m sure you follow:

        Rebellious teenagers should be killed: “If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them, Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die” (Deuteronomy 21:18-21)

        Women who are not virgins when they are married should be killed: “But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel, Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die” (DEUTERONOMY 22:13-21)

        Have you killed any rebellious teens or non-virgin brides, “praisecreator”? If not, you are not following the entire Bible.

  4. progressivescholar | Reply

    “Now, thanks to Obama those couples will think twice before getting married, giving children a traditional family, and making a commitment to do the right thing, because living together will be a lot cheaper.”

    Actually, the marriage tax penalty was originally passed in 1969, under Republican President Richard Nixon.

    My question to you is, if the traditional family will be completely and totally annihilated as you predict, why didn’t that already happen?

    The tax penalty was in place for 34 years, but people still got married, and they still had kids. What will change now that a Democrat is in favor of the bill?

    1. praisecreator | Reply

      He is not talking about the federal marriage penalty tax – which is bad enough – he is talking about the new additional marriage penalty tax within this Health Care bill. Why should married people be penalized?

      1. progressivescholar

        Why should married people be penalized? I don’t think they should, so I’m not the best person to ask. Maybe you should ask Richard Nixon since he was the first one to penalize married people.

      2. praiscreator already told you that the Nixon Marriage tax was a federal marriage tax. but in addition to this federal marriage tax Obama wants to charge us to pay 60% more Healthcare fee than couples jsut living together. It seems ot be amazing how yuo desperatly defend Obama’s dicatorship of socialism. normally only those people do something like that who belong to the largest recipients of Obama’s give away sceam and are afraid if we conservatives are taking over the Happy times are over. I am not saying you are one of them reciepients I am jsut wondering because everybody who works for living would love to keep his money, I dont believe in redestiribution – I work for my money and tend to keep it.

      3. progressivescholar

        “I work for my money and tend to keep it.”

        I thought you said you gave to charity? Which one is it?

      4. Yes I do but I decide who gets my money not any socialist stupid idiotic Liberal Goverment. It is not Obamas money it is mine. I make my income pay my thenth to the church (for social sharing decided by the local church and not by any government) and in December I decide for all the charity I make the following year. And it is MY call.

      5. progressivescholar

        I certainly agree with you on one thing, the separation of church and state.

        So tell me how you feel about “faith-based” initiatives. Most likely, your church is receiving taxpayer-funded grants from the government to serve your community. How can you justify belonging to a church that most likely receives funding from the government?

      6. progressivescholar

        I also think it’s interesting that you give in December. Why not all year long? Or are you giving to charity just to get a tax write-off?

      7. Now please let me explain that again in lamen terms: For example: IN december of 2009 when I made my years out accounting finals I decided how much money I have to give to charity in 2010. Now this is called budgeting. And than i am looking for projects I can participate throughout 2010. this is my 2010 years Charity Budget. and from this Budget I keep 10% in reserve for unexpected occurances again for example a weather disaster (Hurricanes or Tornados in Texas, or earthquake in Haiti and so on). Did I make myself understood now please

    2. Like I tried to explain to you before – OK it wont work I also tried to explain to you the difference of an oposer to Affirmative action and the radical white hoods and you did not get it and kept acusing me of being a white hod – you sure must be a clone of Obama as long as you can insult opposers – But that to another story – again as we tried to explain to you there is a difference between the federal marriage tax which is collected through small fees by issuing a license, and the 60% penalty for living a traditional marriage. No the holy sacrament of Marriage will never vanish because too many people are still believing in doing the right thing and besides OBAMA – 1009 days left and counting

      1. progressivescholar

        No sir, I’m not a clone of anybody. I have seen Obama break some of his promises, and I am not pleased with his behavior regarding numerous issues.

        Now, can we please debate the issues instead of you calling me names?

        How can you say that Democrats are effectively destroying marriage and then say that marriage will never vanish? If you believe that marriage is not truly threatened, why make such a fuss about what Democrats may or may not want to do?

      2. Look my friend, why do you argue over semantics. The christian Americans will not give up on marriage because it is Gods commentment, however this penality tax will errode the rest of societies few on marriage. “Saving money for those people is more important than moral living”.

      3. progressivescholar

        Since you already know for sure what affect this penalty tax will have on our society (using psychic powers perhaps), can you also use that power to figure out tomorrow’s lottery numbers?

  5. This is LUDICROUS! What next? Will he limit how many children people can have, or have our first born shot? This is a democracy people, not a dictatorship! Stand up for what you believe! Man this makes me angry how many peolpe were blindsided by this man. Then again the “wolf” dresses in sheep’s clothing, doesn’t he?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: