Monthly Archives: August, 2011

Radical Muslim University ‘UNISSA’ established in Amarillo, TX

When I think of our politicians I think of Judas who sold Jesus Christ for 30 pieces of Silver to his tormentors and executioner; or an old Clint Eastwood movie called “For a fistful of Dollars”, where a man sells his soul for everybody who pays

Our politicians sold our beloved West Texas to our enemies – guess what – for a fistful of Dollars.

Amarillo, Panhandle, Texas – wide open spaces, subject to many amazing Country songs, images for hundreds of amazing movies such as John Wayne’s “Red River”; historical Ranches who have been in family ownership over generations. This is where the world-famous “Chisholm Trail” happened and where the world famous “Route 66” goes through bringing thousands of tourists to the area.

John Wayne and Walter Brennan in "Red River"

John Wayne and Walter Brennan in "Red River"

People are nice, conservative, friendly, and down to earth. We go to church and we believe in God and Country.

The only downside to this rural area is that many young people move away for the lack of jobs or they want a career other than ranching that they can only find in the big city.

All that seems to be over now

It takes special people who want to live there and share this amazing community. So, why would emigrants with no ties to Christian conservative farm and ranch backgrounds want to move into this area?

Immigrants usually look for big cities with big communities, preferably near people of the same heritage where they can establish their life and prosper.

Unbelievable but true, Muslims have now invaded the last stronghold of a Texas Christian Conservative area – Amarillo West Texas, Panhandle.

On Loop 7300 S. 335 the “Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali” known as UNISSA establishes another radical Islam indoctrination center covered as “Community center”.

UNISSA Construction Site on Loop 7300 S. 335

UNISSA Construction Site on Loop 7300 S. 335

Community center – What community?

One who thinks Muslims, as soon as they are established, assimilate and adjust to our society is a fool.



From experience it always works the same system.

1)    Well educated Muslims in good suits, mostly flanked by modern progressive woman, show up and hold sententiousness speeches of how peaceful Islam is and how much they look forward to assimilating, and they will of course not try to change anything and welcome the opportunity to be part of society.

2)    As soon as they are established, receive tax contributions, and “Con” everybody they start lawsuits on discrimination grounds in order to change the entire neighborhood society to their advantage.

Not true; Nothing but Polemic?

Katy, Texas 2011

Katy Texas is a beautiful little community on Interstate 10, near Houston, Texas with God fearing people trying to make a living. There is also a pig farm, family owned for generations and established for over a hundred years.

And though there are over 60 Mosques in the greater Houston Area, therefore within easy reach of Muslims in Katy, a self-declared Muslim “Community Center” moved into the neighborhood of the pig farmer.

Muslims do not like pigs for religious reasons so you would think that when founding a community center one would take a closer look at the neighborhood and choose an area where nothing is in conflict with one’s religious beliefs.

Well think twice.

Those Muslims bought their property on purpose right next to a pig farm and demanded that the pig farmer move away because the smell of the pigs was bothering the Muslims.

The pig farmer, Craig Baker, did the right thing and started a protest in form of an annual “Pig Race” which has become a communal highlight.

But as funny as that sounds, if you watch the video “Camel for two and the Islamic association” claims that all they want is an integrated Community.

But why in God’s name directly next to a pig farm if not to provoke and push their radical Muslim will on everybody else.

Back to Amarillo Texas

I already asked why a Muslim community would want to move into the middle of nowhere, in cattle breeding and farm land with no amenities of the big city and no chance of big business.

This is a small puzzle piece of a bigger picture. Everybody who understands military tactics knows that two things are important to win a war:

1)    Infiltrators, known as “sleepers” who live well established in the center land

2)    Infrastructure in form of transport routs

Infiltration: Throughout the past years, especially since the Obama administration so openly supports them, Muslims have infiltrated our country and established their communities all over America. Tactically perfect always near major transport routes or surrounding big cities, but always well networked through the radical and terrorist tied CAIR.

Thanks to Obama’s open support they have become more socially aggressive on a daily basis. Since Obama has occupied the White House they have aggressively tried to change our society and install openly Sharia Law in our Law system, something they would
not have dared in the pre-Obama era.

Infrastructure/Transport Routes: This answered the real question why UNISSA chose Amarillo Texas as a headquarters.

Checking their website, they also train a so called cadet corps in their University. And Amarillo is exactly in the center of the United States directly on Interstate 40 (former Route 66) which connects the East coast and the West coast of the United
States, from L.A to New York, the perfect tactical transport position.

A member of UBD-army-cadet receive her promotion insignia from the goh

A member of UBD-army-cadet receive her promotion insignia from the goh

And the rural area where everybody owns a gun is a perfect place for militant militia training.

Sooner or later Muslims will show their real face and sooner or later, when they have enough of getting Sharia Law rejected in regular courts, and sooner or later more sooner than later when the infiltration is complete, Muslims will try to take over America
and transform our great Republic into a Muslim Allah country.

Muslim beliefs in Sharia and our society do not get along and that is a fact.

And Interstate 40 is the perfect Route to transport Muslim Warriors, trained at the UNISSA in Amarillo, TX in every direction within a short period of time.

This needs to stop! If you love our beloved neighborhood and if you love America you do what is necessary.

Don’t be fooled: If you refuse to do your part in protecting our beloved Texas, Muslims will have no problem fighting and lobbying their demands.

If you love Texas, if you love our Constitutional America you need to call your Congress Rep., Senator, Governor Rick Perry, and everybody you know to make sure this will not happen, I ALREADY DID.

Not on our tax Dollars – we do not want them in our area.

Contact your representative here:


Texas U.S. Senators


U.S.Senators represent the entire state. Texas’ current U.S.Senators
are Senator John Cornyn and Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison. See their websites for current contact information.


Texas U.S. Representatives
Congressional District 13–Congressman Mac Thornberry
Texas Congressional Member Websites
Congressional District 19–Congressman Randy Neugebauer
Texas Congressional Member Websites
Texas State Senator
Senate District 31–Senator Kel Seliger
Capitol Office: EXT E1.606
Capitol Phone: (512) 463-0131 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (512)
463-0131 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Capitol Address: P.O. Box 12068, Capitol Station
Austin, TX 78711
District Address: P.O. Box 9155
Amarillo TX 79105
Phone: (806) 374-8994 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
(806) 374-8994 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
State District Offices
Texas State Representative
House District 86–Representative John T. Smithee
Capitol Office: CAP 1W.10
Capitol Phone: (512) 463-0702 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
(512) 463-0702 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Capitol Address: P.O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768
District Address: 320 S. Polk, 1st Floor,, Lobby Box 28
Amarillo TX 79101
Phone: (806) 372-3327 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
(806) 372-3327 end_of_the_skype_highlighting



God Bless America



UNISSA – Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali

Youtube Video: Pig Farm in Katy Texas:



Sharia Law in ObamaCare? – What is “DHIMMITUDE”?

The past few weeks many of my facebook friends have asked what the word “Dhimmitude“ is? There are a lot of rumors about this word on the internet.

Rumors say that this word is established on page 107 in H.R. 3590 of the 111th Congress also known as Patient protection and affordable Healthcare act or among us conservatives as “ObamaCare”.

People who read my blogs/columns know that I am not a fan of spreading rumors and that I try very hard to make my columns founded in facts.

Here are some personal facts about me

I am a Judeo-Christian Reagan conservative American and I strongly believe in the Constitution of the United States.

I strongly believe that the United States of America is a Christian Nation built on Christian principles and that Christianity is the leading religion in the Unites States. In God we trust is not just words but the lifeline of our moral values and principles. It is a fact that our founding Fathers had God in mind with every word when they wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

But that is not a one-way street. If one claims to love the constitution he/she also has to accept the First Amendment of the same as it was established by the founding fathers for a reason; and the reason is to protect and allow people to live free and pursue their happiness even in their religious beliefs. And the first amendment is clear the freedom of religion, speech, press and petition.

You may or may not like it, but every person in America has the right to worship as long as it accepts Christianity as the fundamental basics of our Society.

And as far as I am concerned, one can pray to Allah, Buddah, the holy ashtray, a broomstick or even to the pastafarian noodle monster (yes this cult actually exists), as long as this person does not bothers me and accepts that I do not want to be associated with or socialize with this person, and as long as this person respects the fundamental Judeo-Christian principles of our American society.

I dislike and distrust Muslims as much as everybody else in America

I strongly believe that the Muslim religion is a brutal, inhumane, and dangerous religion and does not co-exist with our Christian principles. I also believe that Muslims are not willing to assimilate into our society because they demand Sharia Law as leading law which puts this above the established Laws in the United States of America based on the Constitution.

But as long as the Lawmakers tell me that Islam is an established religion I have to accept that. All I can do is keep fighting the legal battle to keep the establishment of Sharia out of our legal system.

I dislike Obamacare at least as much if not more than every other conservative

But I reject and dislike it because of facts and not because of rumors. And facts are what I battle, the fact that it is unconstitutional, it is a socialist system, the fact that it is not financeable, and many, many more reasons.

I don’t spread rumors only well established information

And this is what I am doing now.

So here are the facts on “Dhimmitude”

As much as we demand from Muslims to accept our Constitution in the United States as intelligent human beings we have to give Muslims in Muslim countries the same acceptance of their Laws based on their principles and the principles of law in Muslim countries is Sharia Law.

If anybody, just like me, does not like Sharia then stay out of a Muslim country and stay in America.

“Dhimmitude” – yes Dhimmitude is based on Sharia Law, but other than the rumors that are spread it has absolutely nothing to do with population control. Dhimmitude regulates the treatment of prisoners of war under Sharia Law.

Dhimmitude is the system of governing population conquered by jihad Wars encompassing all of the demographic, ethnic, and religious aspects of the political system. The word “dhimmitude” as a historical concept, was coined by “Bat Ye’or” in 1983 to describe the legal and social conditions of Jews and Christians subject to Islamic rules.

The word “dhimmitude” comes from the Arabic word “Dhimmi” and means “protected”. “Dhimmi” was the name that applied by the Arab-Muslim conquerors to indigenous non-Muslim population who surrendered by treaty (Dhimma) to Muslim domination.

And just as we in the United States and the Western European Civilization rule every resident or religion in a court of law under our laws based on Christian principles Muslims ruled the conquered population on Sharia Law no matter what religion or background they came from.

Dhimmitude encompasses the relationship of Muslims and non-Muslims at the theological, social, political, and economical levels as well as the relationship between numerous ethno-religious dhimmi groups.

For books by Bat Ye’or, see

Dhimmitude and ObamaCare

The rumor spread on the internet is that ObamaCare page 107 exempts Muslims from public healthcare based on Dhimmitude. This is the biggest nonsense I have heard in a long time.

I spent 2 full days and not only read, but also used available software to cross-reference Obamacare on this and it is not true.

Page 107 of “H.R. 3590 “Patient protection and affordable Healthcare act” speaks of the Tax exemption on Obamacare based on IRS code 501(a).

For those not familiar with this Law this section speaks about “organizations described under subsections (c) or (d) or section 401(a) to be exempt from taxation under this subtitles unless such exemption is denied under section 502 or 503”.

In layman terms – every major recognized religion in the United States and that includes almost all Christian denominations as well as Buddhism, Islam, and some recognized Cults, enjoys the privilege of certain tax exemptions.

So I looked up religious exemptions on Healthcare and found some on the pages 326, 327, and 328. And again there was no mentioning of Muslims at all.

The fact is that on these pages the Healthcare bill exempts legally recognized religions based on IRS section 501(a) from participating in healthcare if their religion rejects traditional medicine or health treatment based on religious beliefs and views.

Or in layman terms – people who reject medical treatment and believe exclusively in the healing power of God and prayer.

Quick out of my mind I can think of Amish (not sure about them), Jehovah’s Witnesses, and self-declared prophets traveling through the country performing miracle healings.

Now, I personally know for a fact that my savior Jesus Christ can alone heal me or by the laying on of hands. I also know that believing in God my savior makes me stronger and helps me during the healing process, but until Jesus comes back I will still go to the doctor when I am sick. I will also continue to pray and ask the Lord to heal me either miraculously or through the doctor’s
who treat me – This to me is the best combination.

And last time I checked, and believe me when I tell you I was stationed in Muslim countries; I have never heard of Muslims rejecting medical treatment based on religious beliefs.


You may or may not like it, but “Dhimmitude” has no establishment in Obamacare whatsoever nor did I find any indication of
mentioning Muslims or Islam in the entire Bill.

So I keep rejecting Obama Care for the obvious unconstitutional, socialist, and financial reasons.

Let’s keep the fight on against ObamaCare and against the Muslimization of our country based on established facts, let us forget about rumors and get back to more important work – to save and protect the United States of America from destruction through Obama socialism. 


1)    U.S. Government Printing Office – H.R. 3590


3)    Yale Law school on U.S. Constitution

4)    Bat Ye’or – Curriculum Vitae

5)    Cornell University on IRS Law section 501(a)

Rick Perry – how to adumbrate a Debate absent

~~ In Americapeople are not subject to the Government, the Government is subject to the people ~~

 (Gov. Rick Perry, on his presidential announcement speech in S.C. August 13, 2011)

Governor Rick Perry

Governor Rick Perry

The 2nd Presidential Debate in Ames, Iowa for the Republican preliminaries is over. Winners, losers, and the first quitter are determined.

Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann won the Iowa Straw Poll slightly ahead of Ron Paul and then former Governor Tim Pawlenty who has now thrown in the towel, but one man managed to shuffle the entire debate without even being there – Governor Rick Perry (TX – R).

Bachmann wins Iowa Straw Poll (Photo AP)

Bachmann wins Iowa Straw Poll (Photo AP)

The Debate

Rick Perry made the smartest move possible by having his staff announce the “high possibility” of him running on Thursday, followed by watching and sitting out the debate, and then Rick Perry making the official announcement of his candidacy for president on Saturday in South Carolina.

Iowa Straw Poll (Getty Images)

Iowa Straw Poll (Getty Images)

With Chris Wallace on stage in Iowa as the igniter, the “advocate diabolic (the devil’s advocate)” the debate actually became interesting. Every good debate needs one like this.

People have different opinions on this debate, but I have to admit that I liked this one a lot better than the first debate in New Hampshire and though many of my friends (or better almost all of them) disagree with me, I liked it better because of Chris Wallace.

But let’s be honest here: What are the preliminaries and what are they good for?

As a fan of Formula 1 car racing I see the preliminaries as the qualifying, the “everybody against everybody selection” for the actual race.

And as a former soldier of the Armed Forces I know for a fact that you can’t train and prepare man/woman for the worst by playing nice.

The first debate in New Hampshire was more like a choir performance where all of the candidates showed their uttermost politeness, all had the same message and basically nothing really new was said.

For me as voter it was hard to determine which candidate would be best equipped to replace Barrack Obama in the White House.

“Minnesota Nice” is beautiful and “Texas Hospitality” is a marvelous thing, but we are preparing for the most brutal and below the
belt face off going into the 2012 election. Obama will be fighting desperately for re-election and believe me he will not play fair or nice.

Answer in Iowa (Nate Beeler)

Answer in Iowa (Nate Beeler)

Jon Stewart, an aggressive Obama supporter and radical left wing talk show host of the “Daily show” for example already started with sexual insults towards the Bachmann’s and since Obama never stepped in condemning this audacity he showed “Silent

The election is on and the Chris Wallace “head on head fight calls” was actually nothing but a warm up for what is yet to come.

Pitting Michelle Bachmann against Tim Pawlenty on their records was an excellent move. Democrats will do the same, and worse. And for the first time the usually very confident and competent Michelle Bachmann showed signs of being “off guard” and insecure for a moment.

Well Congresswoman Bachmann better get used to it, it won’t get any easier.

Pitting Tim Pawlenty against Mitt Romney on “Romney care” is of course nothing new and also happened in New Hampshire, but here Wallace proved that he is a professional “Journalist” trained on counter warfare and challenging the contestants;

Newt Gingrich actually showed what is to be expected from a Presidential Hopeful when Chris attacked him on his records Gingrich fired back accusing him of playing “Mickey Mouse games”. Gingrich put Wallace and the media in their place and showed great fighting spirit.

Mitt Romney did the same when he challenged Wallace about the Massachusetts Constitution.

I was amazed and quite disappointed at Ron Paul when Chris Wallace started the next hot topic: Terrorism and foreign wars.

Ron Paul, cornered by his opponents threw the question in the room “who determines a Terrorist” indicating that there is no
such lawful determination.

For your information Congressman Paul: The term “Terrorist” is determined in the ICRC – International Humanitarian Law (Geneva Convention) from 1949.

This document clearly defines an “Enemy Combatant”, “Civilian” and “Terrorist” and based on that international agreement is the “Code of Conduct” also known as “U.S. Military Rules of Engagement”.

The bold moves of Chris Wallace finally caused Byron York to step forward and attack Jon Huntsman on his position of being in favor of Civil Unions.

All of those things actually made the debate interesting and put some spice in it. Very interesting was the question about Rick Perry entering the race and while all candidates played nice only Ron Paul gave a few fiery comments on the issue. But I am
afraid Congressman Paul could say: Be careful what you wish for. I am sure Perry would have given him the right answer on the terrorist question.

As a voter I expect from my candidate two things:

1)    He/She has to represent my beliefs as a fiscal Judeo-Christian conservative

2)    He/She has to be able to defend those principals

But here is the thing.

Giving election speeches in front of a crowd is easy. Politicians are trained and used to do that. As a tea party member, and fiscal conservative I can step in front of 10,000 people anytime and give a speech. I can say things to make the audience cheer or say things to get their blood boiling ready for a fight.

It is like preaching to the choir. There are only likeminded people in the crowd who believe the same things and share the same opinions.

But defending the records and the principles in an open discussion with an opponent is something completely different. Anybody who has ever been in a debate knows that.

In a debate you have to expect attacks and counter attacks, you deal with limited speaking time where you have to a) get your
message out and at the same time b) defend your record and position.

And if you think that is easy – try; I am a well trained rhetorician and I’ve been told that I’m strongly opinionated, bullheaded, stubborn and pretty good at combat rhetoric.

You have to be faster, quicker, better informed, and well prepared and never lose or show any weakness.

And here is where Rick Perry comes into play and why he overshadowed the entire debate. If you have watched Rick Perry during the gubernatorial race he has been attacked a lot of times very hard by his opponents.

But Governor Perry is good in that game. Rick Perry is a highly experienced politician with the aura of a statesman.

Texas Governor Rick Perry

Texas Governor Rick Perry

He always shows Texas coolness, never shows any weakness, has his records straight, is well informed, and understands the principles of “counterattack without direct attack”.

Making a “counterattack without attacking the opponent” is an Art not many master.

You have to be prepared to take an opponents comment and shove it back down his throat without being vicious or aggressive, simple by using logic and well founded information.

And that makes him a tough discussion partner; one that rules the stage.

Rick Perry does not need foul attacks or dirty games. He is a highly experienced rhetorician, he knows what he is doing and the big plus is he is humble.

The beauty of the American Republic and the U.S. Constitution is that we are all entitled to an opinion. Since Governor Perry announced his candidacy thousands of blogs and comments appeared on the internet.

Some in favor, some calling him a RINO and part of the system, some positive, some negative, and some neutral pointing out both sides.

It is not my place to tell you what to think or who to vote for that is for you to decide. The field of conservative contestants is now there and full and you can choose for yourself which candidate is your favorite one.

I already did for myself.

But one issue nobody can deny, and that was also sensed in the debate in Iowa – Governor Perry is a major factor and force in the preliminaries and all of the candidates knew that. In my opinion that is the main reason Chris Wallace had such an easy time bringing some tension into the debate.

I watched the debate twice and I am convinced because of Governor Perry the tension was there, candidates were forced to show corners and edges and Chris Wallace just picked up on it and used it.

One way or the other I am finally looking forward to the third and final debate on September
22, 2011 in Orlando Florida. This will be the debate that actually cleans the field.


This is my 100th Blog on WordPress, and I would like to take the opportunity to give grace.

First, I want to say thank you to my readers and followers, Facebook friends, and fellow patriots such as Ann-Marie
Murrell, Chet & Natalie Nichols, Suzanne Sharer, Heidi Kutney, Michaela Brandner, Antoniette Walker and many, many others without you I would not be here anymore. You keep me on my toes and make me want to be better with every single blog.

Thank you for your patience, your time and your compassion. You have added many comments and sometimes you have even disagreed with me, but I love, honor, and respect each and every comment.

Thank you to my son Jessy. You are the reason I fight for a better future, the light of my eye and star in my heaven.

Thanks to Annette for constantly cross reading and editing, you have done a marvelous job. I love you.

Thanks to my parents who brought me up well, showed me that a man is entitled to his opinion as long as he puts it on a foundation – This made me strong.

And last but not least – thank you my God almighty in heaven and my savior Jesus Christ for providing me with the rhetorical talent to be outspoken.

Thank you to the brave men and women of the United States Armed Forces, who gave their ultimate sacrifice in order to provide and defend the blanket of freedom, that was thought of by the Founding Fathers, and established as the United States Constitution.

God Bless them all

God Bless them all

Your ultimate sacrifice allows me to share my opinion no matter if I am right or wrong.

God Bless ya’ll and





ICRC – International Humanitarian Law (Geneva Convention)

%d bloggers like this: