How the former Miss USA 2003, Harvard Lawyer and Republican Hopeful can salvage the GOP’s Image and easy become the Democrats Nightmare in 2014 AND in 2016
Fact is the Republican Party has among many others two major problems; one is the trench-warfe between the establishment, the Independent and the Grassroots Conservatives on one side and second Problem the GOP has is a major image problem. Those are facts we cannot deny.
Especially the latter is a major issue. While Conservatives have in every aspect no matter if it is social, economic or any other issue the better answers, solutions and ideas, the Democrats sell themselves better by using general known Communication tactics (Topic of my next column) as well as Saul Alinsky tactics to give the GOP the bad image of a Racists, woman hating, coldhearted Party that only cares for the rich.
There is hope
Outspoken Senators Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Liberty Issues and Ted Cruz “Missile” on ObamaCare not only rule the media but also the social networks among Grassroots Conservatives, Libertarians and Tea-Party activists.
But we also have to look into the nearby future and prepare for 2014 to maintain majority in congress and regain control over the Senate.
There are more true conservatives that need our attention and support. One of them is the young Lady I am about to introduce.
A young Lady that fights a fearless concentrated and neither in the regular media nor in the social media almost not-acknowledged fights for her political future in one of the Bluest States of the Nation – Illinois.
And it is a shame that she seems to vanish in lack of nationwide recognition because SHE IS the type of person we need in the GOP as the future. And she can drive the Progressive Liberals nuts, which sure is a major bonus.
She is outspoken, highly intelligent, young and beautiful enough to appeal to the younger voters has true conservative values without the Schoolmaster appearance of the Old-Man-Establishment.
Meet Erika N. Harold
Small town girl next door Erika N. Harold is everything but the “average Girl-Next-Door”. She is one of the most intelligent, interesting, and amazing characters in today’s politics.
Far away from the Democrat accusations of the GOP being a white-man-racist Party Erika is the living proof we are not. And she has a record that speaks volumes.
Born in February 20, 1980 Erika grows up in Urbana, Illinois a rural 37,000 people town with an amazing varied ethnical background.
On her father’s side she has Greek, German and Welsh ancestry and on her mother’s side Native-American, African-American and Russian descent.
Erika attended University High school and Urbana High School in Urbana Illinois. In 2007 she graduated with a B.A. as a Phi Beta Kappa from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and her law degree from Harvard University J.D. in 2007.
- While still going to school Erika Harold was 2002 selected Miss Illinois. Her Platform was “Preventing Youth Violence and Bullying: Protect Yourself, Respect Yourself”.
Her Platform choice grew out of personal experience being the subject to sexual and racial harassment with teachers and school administrators having her concerns dismissed.
- In 2003 Erika Harold became Miss America
- In the first week of her 2003 Pageant campaign she additionally adopted a dual platform for sexual abstinence. Of course not without being hammered by – you guessed it – Liberals accusing her of having a hidden agenda.
Washington Times Officials suggested a liberal bias on the pageant officials since they had no problem with the 1998 contestant running an HIV prevention platform.
She officially refused to drop the topic of sexual abstinence during a speech in 2002 at the National Press Club in Washington and received 38 support letters from members of Congress.
- Recently Erika has gained unfortunate headlines as GOP senior Official Jim Allen called her in an email to “Republican News Watch” a “little Queen” and liken her to a “Streetwalker with the Democrat party and RINO Republicans as pimps”
He later on had to resign over this remarks.
I guess we do a hell of a way better job the democrats ever can killing our own candidates with racial slurs and so play the democrats right in their hands. What a jerk Jim Allen is.
Politics (taken directly from her Website)
Taxation and Regulation
Erika believes that the government’s role should only be to build a framework or business that does not inhibit innovation or create excessive layers of bureaucracy. Narrowing the scope of power delegated to administrative agencies. A streamlined and modernized tax code and she opposes increases in individual marginal tax rate or capital gains tax rates.
Erika Harold proposes a Crop Insurance program to safeguard farmer’s needs. In addition she opposes implementations of burdensome regulations that undermine the agricultural industry. Recognizing the increasing global demand for sustainable and renewable energy sources, she also will support biofuels as a tool for addressing those demands.
Erika’s landmark issues are individual liberties, religious freedom according to the First Amendment and to battle every attempt to infringe our second Amendment rights. Other than that she is he a firm believer of the Constitution itself and fights for proper limits on governmental power.
Erika believes in the Declaration of Independence and “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” She is pro-Life and supports reforms within the criminal Justice system.
Unfortunatley Ms. Harold has not responded to my request to answer a few questions going deeper into her believes and stands on current political issues.
1) Wikipedia on Erika Harold
2) Erika Harold for U.S. Congress
3) Republican News Watch
4) PolicyMic – Erika Herold_Miss America tries to Save the Republican Party
5) Meyer Capel Attorneys – Erika N Harold_Law Firm introduction
6) UPI – GOP official resigns after calling Erika Harold a streetwalker
7) Weekly Standard – Miss America vs. Mr. Incumbent
Now that 2011 has passed and 2012 is here, the battle to take our country back continues.
The past year we had a marathon of GOP Presidential debates and different candidates taking the lead.
Throughout the entire debates the topics were always the same and then slightly adjusted to fit the current happenings in the world.
And so were the answers. All, and I really mean all, candidates were trying to give the right answers to appear “conservative”, but yet cautiously diplomatic to assure not to offend, insult, or really attack anybody, outside of each other. In other words a disappointing PR-show that leaves me to the point where after hours of debates I am still not convinced as of who to give my vote to.
None of them seems to be willing to grab the hot coals with their bare hands and give those answers, which many grassroots conservatives want to hear.
How to get America back to work
This is the one constant in every debate, and every candidate is determined to prove how “Reagan Conservative” they are in reciting, like a mantra, the “same ol’-same ol’” policy of lowering taxes, deregulating, and so on.
Only Newt Gingrich shortly mentioned one of the real issues, leaving that hot-coal-topic immediately and not going into details, and that is UNIONS.
One extremely important solution to get America back to work is to break the power-neck of the Unions.
In theory Unions are a private-non-governmental-organization sponsored by the Federal Government and should provide “Legal Assistance to Workers who’s constitutional and Legal Rights as employees are violated”.
However, Unions stopped “being” that a long time ago. Like most things, the initial idea is good, but then greed breeds corruption. They are a criminal Mafia style Organization and nobody seems to care or is too scared to do anything about it.
The fact that the sitting President, Obama, has an affiliation with criminals is evident; — Not without a reason he calls Second Generation Mafia boss “Jimmy Hoffa Jr.” his buddy (and he IS the son of a Mafia gangster) and plays golf during Christmas with a school friend who has been arrested in Prostitution charges.
In my opinion, this major entity that determines and influences politics has been misusing federal funds in order to funnel it back to the Democratic Party to keep control of their interests, without the average person the wiser. This is obscene and illegal, but unfortunately it has been going on for decades. In a nutshell, our government subsidizes criminal enterprise and there seems to be no politician willing to take them on.
In some states you cannot even acquire a contract as a contractor if you don’t pay your dues (in my book of law that is called: danegeld) to the Unions and submit to hire Union workers only. And if you refuse – well accidents happen all the time. This is clearly “criminal”, but normal since politicians and judges look the other way.
Unions are assured with their election contribution, their re-election.
And the very same Politicians and Judges grant the Unions the right to intervene in Companies decisions to either produce or preserve employment.
The fact is that in the past 6 months alone Unions have caused or endangered over 130,000 Jobs in the United States either by stopping to build a Boeing plant in South Carolina (a right to work State and mentioned by Newt Gingrich) or by stonewalling any negotiations with American Airlines which jeopardized over 130,000 Jobs and retirees.
Breaking the neck of the Unions and putting them back into their place is not only a small, but also a necessary key element to get America back to work. That is why I desperately want to hear the following statements from a candidate:
1) I will make America a “Right to work nation” and make this a “Constitutional Amendment”
2) I will audit the Unions and assure that funds given to this private institution are used proper to secure the constitutional and legal rights of American workers and workers under “legal Status”, otherwise Unions will be defunded
3) I will make a clear commitment that Unions are a private representation and membership is voluntarily, and Unions are NOT to make policy or politics, but have only one duty – representation when asked for
But, I guess that is wishful thinking because everyone remembers what happened to Robert Kennedy.
None of the candidates are willing to call things by their name when it comes to National Security. I agree, of course, that the two main pillars of National Security are financial independence (bringing the budget in order) and America’s military strength and position in the world. But there is a third Pillar, which gets completely ignored and that is National Security at home.
We don’t need to look for Muslim Terrorists in foreign countries they are already here; and they do a marvelous job of infiltrating our nation through their so-called “Representations”.
Of course not every Muslim is a Terrorist but 99% of all terrorists are Muslims.
Instead of cooperating with Law-enforcement Muslims take the position of “Victims of Discrimination” using this policy to avoid any cooperation and play the “Victim Card”.
Financing Terrorists all over the world, dismantling our Constitution, and trying to sneak Sharia Law into our court rooms calling it cultural heritage is NOT assimilation nor the practice of freedom of religion it is clear infiltration to take over our country.
And to make things worse, Hillary Clinton and the State Department just held a summit with Arab Nations to strike down the 1st Amendment making critics of Islam a crime under the pretence of “Inflammatory Speech”.
The UN sponsored this summit and the role model is similar to European Laws, which already bow to the Muslims.
I was actually waiting for one candidate to condemn this meeting in the last debate – BUT NOTHING.
Fact is, in order to assure a strong National Security we first need to establish a strong National Identity and that is, or should be, a clear commitment by the Candidates to a Judeo-Christian Heritage.
But that one is missing as well.
A fourth pillar to a strong National Security is a strong National Independency.
Again, what I am missing with every candidate is the clear commitment to defund financially and withdraw politically from this senseless organization and make a clear statement that any interference in domestic issues through Agenda 21 or other policies will only result in a final disembarkation of this criminal corrupt organization.
This would not only strengthen America’s position, but also save us billions of Dollars as Ann-Marie Murrell of PolitiChicks stated with utmost precision in her column “Some Simple Solutions to our National Debt” on Patriot Update.
Kicking the UN would therefore be a double monumental victory for America. Saving us tons of money as Ann-Marie says, and making us independent from the UN, which would strengthen our Sovereignty.
This is just an excerpt of what bothers me with those debates.
Nothing but a lot of blah-blah, repetition, and the very same diplomatic packed political correct standard message hoping to please the conservative voters, but yet making sure that the other side is not offended.
Many of the conservative and independent voters are still undecided. You might think since we’re so close to the primaries that the candidates have convinced us who would be the best equipped for the job and who would truly and truthfully represent us, but I hear in my network all the time that it’s quite the opposite.
As long as the candidates are not willing to hit the nail on the head and call things as they are and walk away from the standard answers (Lord have mercy they have preached them so many times to us – I can recite those answers in advance), and give us the “right” answers, this election will be just another fiasco with nothing but RINO’s.
So please all you candidates out there – TELL US THE TRUTH; GET TO THE POINT AND START REPRESENTING US AND NOT POLITICS – WE THE PEOPLE fight for America, we work our behinds off to save this Nation, and the last thing we want or need is another flip-flopping coward – what we need is a tough conservative candidate to beat Obama and return the government to the people.
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Sources / Related Links:
How does a Conservative County Clerk in Texarkana, Bowie County/East Texas end up facing jail, fines, and loss of job for defending respectively and adding the “Pledge of Allegiance” as minutes to the County meeting?
“I shall never surrender nor retreat.
Then, I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism, & of everything
dear to the American character, to come to our aid with all dispatch.”
(Excerpt from the Alamo Letter, William B. Travis,
Commandancy of the Alamo/Bexar, Fby. 24th 1836)
What wonderful words to read. Every time I visit the Alamo and read those words I get Goosebumps.
For 235 years the principles of “patriotism”, “Liberty”, “Justice” and everything dear to the American Character have been the backbone and fundamental spirit of this nation.
Men and Women in the U.S. Armed forces have sacrificed everything from family life to their greatest sacrifice, their lives to defend those principles. 185 men died at the Alamo defending the same.
But those times are apparently over.
Texarkana, Bowie County, East Texas – For 12 years the world in East Texas was, according to Judge Sterling Lacy, who identifies himself on his facebook page, a good conservative.
The county clerk was always a Democrat, so Judge Lacy, a spineless RINO, who admits he never added the “Pledge of Allegiance” and invocation to the minutes out of fear he could be “sued by organizations such as the ACLU” had nothing to worry about.
What a wonderful thought to know that our Judges have to be scared to be patriots and honor our fallen Heros because a radical left wing organization financed by Tax Dollars could use OUR tax contribution and sue them.
Isn’t America a wonderful country? What do we need foreign enemies for? We have the social terrorist in our own country and we even finance them with tax Dollars.
But in 2010 times changed in Bowie County; Natalie Nichols, a wonderful mother, wife, and fiscal conservative fought a successful election exactly on those patriot, constitutional, fiscal conservative principles and conquered the County Clerk’s office.
With enthusiasm she started her new calling serving the people of Bowie County, never leaving her patriotic principles out of sight. And as records show she always added the Pledge as well as the invocation.
However, on June 13, 2011 Judge Lacy decided, together with Precinct 4 commissioner Pat McCoy (another spineless RINO Conservative) to remove the Pledge from the minutes. Interestingly, is that they waited for this exact day on purpose.
On June 13, 2011County Clerk Nichols was in Dallas, Texas for training and could not attend the meeting.
On June 23, 2011when returning from training Nichols faced the Judge in the next court meeting where she said: “Over the years, many brave men and women have paid the ultimate sacrifice with their blood and their lives to protect this great nation that includes our most sacred flag. I will not dishonor their service or sacrifice. We shouldn’t be fighting to hide our allegiance to the flag; we should be fighting to proclaim it!”
On a County Commissioner Court meeting on July 11, 2011 things got out of hand when Lacy addressed the members of the court about the removal of the Pledge and Prayer from court documents claiming that the minutes were left out “the opening ceremony of devotional Prayer, and Pledge”.
Natalie Nichols immediately replied “that’s not true….the pledge and prayer are certainly there”. Judge Lacy immediately tried to silence here causing Nichols to exasperate “but you are lying.”
Nichols later on apologized for her outburst in court, but still stands to the principles. N.
Nichols also thanks the only lone member of the court who voted against the action saying “we all need to say a huge thank you to
Commissioner Addington for standing up for both God and Country and voting against it”.
Nevertheless, the county judge launched an investigation with Bowie County Sheriff James Prince against Nichols.
They never questioned her or gave her any chance to justify herself, 2 days after the investigation was launched sheriff Prince already turned the case over to the ADA.
Natalie Nichols became aware of the investigation against her through Texarkana Gazette. They did not even have the balls to tell her themselves.
Chet Nichols, Natalie’s husband told me on July 18, 2011that they are trying to wrap things up and address the Grand Jury onJuly 28, 2011.
Nichols, who by sec. 81.003 of Texas law, has the authority to record, amend, attest, and seal the minutes with the official county seal, says “they can sue me, remove me from office, but I will not remove the Pledge of Allegiance or the Prayer from the official recording of this court, when the action did in fact take place.”
And this is what you can do to help her and avoid injustice
Call the Bowie County DA’s office:
601 Main Street
Phone: (903) 735 – 4800
Call the Judge Lacy’s office and let him know what you think of him
710 James Bowie Drive, New Boston,
Phone: (903) 628 – 6718
Call your congressman and woman and let them know.
Governor Rick Perry’s office
Telephone Information and Referral Hotline [for Texas callers] :
Citizen’s Opinion Hotline [for Texas callers] :
Information and Referral and Opinion Hotline [for Austin, Texas and out-of-state callers] :
Office of the Governor Main Switchboard :
Citizen’s Assistance Telecommunications Device If you are using a telecommunication device for the deaf (TDD),
call 711 to reach Relay
Office of the Governor Fax:
For email go to the Governors Website: http://governor.state.tx.us/contact/
Lt. Governor Dewhurst’s office
Call by phone
Email contact form: http://www.ltgov.state.tx.us/contact.php
Rep. Lavender, George
Room E2.716, Capitol Extension
P.O. Box 2910
2600 N. Robison, Ste.190
Natalie Contact: http://bowiecountyclerk.com
Judge Sterling Lacy contact: http://www.co.bowie.tx.us/ips/cms/countyoffices/countyJudge.html
Commissioners contact: http://www.co.bowie.tx.us/ips/cms/countyoffices/commissionersCourt.html
Sherriff Contact: http://www.co.bowie.tx.us/ips/cms/countyoffices/sheriff.html
District Attorney contact: http://www.co.bowie.tx.us/ips/cms/districtcourt/districtAttorney.html
When Injustice Becomes Law – Resistance becomes Duty
Interview with Natalie is coming next
- Travvis letter on Scribd.com
- Bowie County Commissioner Court Minutes from April 2011
- Bowie County Judge Sterling Lacy Facebook Page
- Red Flame Wire
- Natalie Nichols support and Action page
- sec. 81.003 Texas law:
Lately Christians in this country more and more have become used to being subject to discrimination, oppression, and slandering.
Just this past week Texas Governor Rick Perry (R-TX) had to take the heat because he dared to impose a “National Day of prayer for our beaten Nation on August 6th 2011”.
Critics immediately opposed that his call for a prayer was “too evangelical” as New York Times reports.
I have never heard Muslims call for prayer for our Nation, have you?
Christianity has always been a thorn in the flesh of radical left wing organizations such as the ACLU. Mostly because Christians strongly believe in moral values, the indefeasibility of traditional family, family values, and the right to live.
The latter especially was always a pain in the rear end for the ACLU because it contradicts their Agenda of Abortion.
But things have become worse since that radical Muslim-lover Obama joined the White House. On his very first inaugural tour he traveled to Egyptand declared publically that “The United States of America is no longer a Christian nation” bowing his head before Muslims.
He and his Czars have done everything in their power to promote Muslimization and allow Sharia Law to be installed all at the expense of Christianity in order to destroy it.
Christianity is the foundation of which our Foundation is built. Our founding fathers always had God in their minds and each and every declaration starts by mentioning “God”.
President Obama knows that Christianity as well as the Constitution (and both belong to each other as the fish to the water) is the foundation of everything Conservative Americans believe in.
In order to break our strength he has to take away what we love most – The CONSTITUTION AND OUR FAITH.
Doing so Obama plays a dangerous game with one of the most dangerous religions – Islam.
Obama really believes – if he helps Islamist’s to undermine our society and dismantle Christianity, and in the long run the spirit of the conservatives, he can then control Islam and build a socialist regime in America.
But that is going to back fire on him – because Muslims play Obama like an old piano. They know that as soon as we – the Christians – are destroyed, they will take over our Country and build a Muslim theocracy.
However, Obama in all of his radicalism and blindfolded naivety believing he will be able to control Muslims is not stupid at all.
He knows that by too much open force against Christianity he could produce a potential civil armed conflict. So, he does what Democrats always do best he uses indoctrination as a weapon.
It is quite contradicting that a radical organization like the ACLU who claims to fight for the separation of Church and State supports a radical Muslim faith that will never submit to Democracy and freedom of religion. On the contrary, Muslims are bound to impose a theocracy.
Michael Youssef founder of the Evangelical Church of the Apostles says in an interview with Christian Post: “Islam is a political and social ideology that will never submit to a secular form of government”.
While radical idiotic ACLU joined Forces with terrorist tied CAIR and keeps filing lawsuits against Christianity Obama positioned his Czars in all the important places to provide the proper indoctrination based on regulations for his advantage.
In this particular Case the FCC – Federal Communication Commission.
The best way to indoctrinate Americans is – TELEVISION. It is a fact that almost every American owns a TV, and though most people keep complaining about TV and the programs they keep watching.
In today’s world, kids spend more time in front of the TV than anywhere else. And though many parents really try to control what their children watch they are helpless when the Government uses the FCC issued TV regulations to indoctrinate socialism, muslimization, and other radical agenda’s through Children’s programs, and lately even through Christian Networks such as TBN (Trinity Broadcast Network).
With all of the cable networks leaving moral values by the wayside or surrendering to governmental and ACLU enforced political correctness the Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) has always been the stronghold for Christians and Christian programs.
But apparently “compromise” and “political correctness” has now infected them too.
Rick Warren, who is the pastor of Saddleback church in southern California, author of “Purpose Driven Life” and well known for swearing in Obama, has now become known for his desperate and radical attempt to introduce an interfaith program called “Chrislam”, a mix of Christianity and Islam. On June 8th 2011 TBN chose to impose “censorship” on a 23 year running program because the preacher was naming churches and leaders that have “lost their way” – Rick Warren was one of them.
When Jack Van Impe, of the weekly TV program, Jack Van Impe Presents, (a well known TV pastor) was explaining “Chrislam” and how un-Biblical and dangerous it is to our Christian faith and named 2 specific individuals, Robert Schuller and Rick Warren, TBN would not show the program.
In an open Letter written on June 11, 2011 by Jack Van Impe to all his partners and published on his website, he specifically states what happened and the reasons given by Matt Crouch of TBN on why they were not going to air his program or his DVD offer. Jack Van Impe’s letter can be read here on his website.
An official response from TBN remains unanswered. I requested a written Statement on the matter from TBN and received no reply at all.
A telephone inquiry was made by many of my friends and remains questionable – Telephone operators at TBN are saying the censorship issue is due to the FCC.
Questionable because that is not was told to Jack Van Impe: “On Wednesday afternoon we received a call from Matt Crouch of TBN informing us that they would not run that program, despite having aired it Monday evening. The reason he gave was that we specifically mentioned Rick Warren and Robert Schuller and that it is TBN’s policy that broadcasters are not allowed to rebuke other ministries” (See www.jvim.com/update for full letter).
And here is my major concern:
“1st Amendment of the United States Constitution clearly prohibits the making of any law “respecting establishments of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, infringing on the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of press, interfering right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances”.
So when the FCC, a Governmental organization interferes with a private network of religious faith programs this is a clear violation of the 1st Amendment and unconstitutional.
And if this “censorship” is only based on FCC regulations, why hasn’t TBN opposed it and filed a lawsuit? In my opinion TBN has hidden behind feeblish excuses in order to appease the elite, Rick Warren and Robert Schuller.
The ACLU, Barrack Obama and the Federal Government is so concerned about the separation of State and Religion that it does everything possible in their power to dismantle the Christian influence in our society.
Why would they on the other hand so desperate try to sneak the indoctrination of Islam through the backdoor and even completely violate the 1st Amendment enforcing the indoctrination of a religion through a Governmental regulatory organization?
Texas– still one State under God – And not for Sale
The question is how much longer?
Bottom line is that just like the Nazi’s, the Obama administration pushes its will on the American people using the current media options to their advantage.
And just like WE THE PEOPLE changed the mind of Lt. Governor Dewhurst on the TSA-Anti-Groping-Bill through constitutional force by calling and emailing them, we have to do the same with TV Stations and Networks.
It is up to us to make it clear to them that they live exclusively off of us the viewers and if they don’t start making programs for us we will stop watching them.
Pick up the phone and contact TBN toll free 1-888-731-1000 or TBN’s business office under 1-714-832-2950 or pick up their website and send them a message or simply send them a good old fashioned letter: TBN, P.O. Box, Santa Ana, CA 92711.
Go tell your pastor, make it a case in church, and lobby and gather WE THE PEOPLE to force TBN to give up on the betrayal of true Christianity and take a stand for us.
If you do nothing you can be sure that Texaswill not much longer be “One State under God” and “In God We Trust” will no longer be the American Quote.
If you do nothing our Christian heritage will be erased. WE NEED our Cable Networks to pass on the TRUE Word of God since we cannot count on regular churches anymore.
May God BlessAmerica
~~ How Liberals Dismantle the Constitution Piece by Piece ~~
There is a war going on. And the war is between WE THE PEOPLE – WE THE CONSTITUTION LOVING AMERICANS versus the constitution dismantling liberals.
We’re already used to seeing hits against the constitution by President Obama and his radical thugs of the Democrat party.
Every single day we witness, among many others, hits against traditional marriage, the constant attacks on the second Amendment rights to bear arm, freedom of person liberty through TSA pet downs at Airports, and the unconstitutional force of Obama Care.
Those attacks are perpetrated by lawmakers who actually took an oath to “Defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic” and yet the very same democrat lawmakers, and their appointed czars and radical pundits work very hard every single day to dismantle the Constitution piece by piece.
The latest and most brutal attack on the constitution took place on May 11, 2011 by Indiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David when he ruled against the 4th Amendment of the “Right of Privacy”.
4th Amendment (Search and Seizure)
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.
(Dated back to the English Magna Charta of 1215)
What wonderful words, now worthless.
What happened: The court’s decision is based on a case inVanderburgh County,Indiana. Cops were called to a domestic argument between a couple, husband and wife, outside their apartment.
The couple went back inside their apartment and the husband told police officers that their service was no longer needed. He blocked the doorway to refuse the Police officers entry to the apartment.
The police forcefully made their way into the apartment and the homeowner shoved the Police officer against the wall and then was hit by a second officer with a stun gun, and then arrested.
The entry of the Police officers into the apartment was never asked for by the wife or the husband so the cops, in my opinion, had no legal authorization to go inside.
Sure one can say that this was Mr. Barnes’ own fault by pushing the officer against the wall; however he has every right to defend his home and once he refused entry to the police any further attempt by the same is a violation of his privacy rights.
In a 3-2 decision Justice David writing for the court says if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, homeowners cannot do anything to block the officer’s entry.
As a matter of fact Justice David says that a person arrested following an unlawful entry by police still can be released on bail which allows plenty of opportunities to protest the illegal entry through the court system.
Or in other words up until now the burden of proof rested clearly on the Prosecution (the state), but in this case it appears that it rests on the defendant. Once again if we, the citizens, feel our privacy rights have been violated due to unlawful search and seizure we have to hire a Lawyer and file charges.
Since not everybody can afford high priced Lawyers, this is nothing but a free pass for the police to act as they please.
Just imagine this: As of now any cop if he does not like your face, your car or if he is jealous because you dare to work hard and drive a fancy vehicle can now, according to this law, stop you and search and seize your car whenever he pleases; In front of your family, your kids, and all your friends embarrassing you just as he/she likes.
And there is nothing you can do about it.
I don’t remember when the United States became a Police State with Gestapo Methods.
Justice Steven David, born 1957 was a Chief Defense Counsel for the “Office of Military Commission” the body that was authorized to conduct the military commission to try Guantanamo captives.
He was highly critical of the way the commission had relied on hearsay evidence, secret testimony, and that evidence of abusive interrogation had been suppressed. In fact according to “The Times” he called for the entire military commission system to be scrapped.
In October of 2010 he was appointed by President Obama as Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court.
Since the United States Justice System is based on a “Creative Precedence” system, meaning that, unless the United States High Supreme Court makes a final ruling, many court decisions are based on previous Supreme Court rulings.
We will soon see what this ruling actually means, when illegal or unconstitutional search and seizures become common practice throughout theUnited Statesciting the Indiana Supreme Court Ruling as the precedence case and prototype.
This is the first direct hit against the United States Constitution taking away our most fundamental indefeasible liberty rights.
May God have Mercy on America
Rest in Peace Constitution
- NWI Times
- Find Law for legal professionals
- Supremecourt Ruling Barnes vs. State
- Wikipedia on Justice Steven David
Dear Mr. President,
We are at the point in our beautiful country where we just avoided a Government shutdown by the means of God knows what?
Like most Americans I have followed the “negotiations” (in this case a contradiction in terms) very closely. I also followed your conduct and involvement very closely and I have to say Sir, you have not disappointed me at all.
You still are the finger pointing opportunist you always have been and always will be. You still think you and your favorite thugs Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi can run the country to your own personal advantage.
I am not sure, Sir, what they taught you at Harvard Law School, but it was definitely NOT the Constitution and looking at your personal conduct I have come to the conclusion that any backwoods local community College is better than this Elite School.
In the first place allow me to give you a short excerpt of correct terminology:
Bi-Partisan ship: Does NOT mean Male part, female part, and Liberal Pundit Part of ONE party, while the rest of the country has to duck like a dog when his Highness Obama speaks; Bi-partisan ship means two different political parties.
(Just in case you have mistaken that as well when you rushed America into war in Libya; you spoke of bi-partisan decisions. Well Sir the United Nations is NOT part of our system).
Divided Power: Does NOT mean divided between the three musketeers Barrack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi; Ruling the country based on their personal ideology over the head of WE THE PEOPLE.
Divided Power means “President – Congress – Senate” in a trinity. And the Congress and the Senate speak for WE THE PEOPLE and not for Harry Reid and Barrack Obama.
Childish: Well Sir it is not childish to accept the fact that our country has to economize our spending. It is not your money Mr. President. You are nothing but the elected administrator of the people’s money. The sooner you accept the fact that you are nothing but MY SERVANT for a limited amount of time (not short enough) the better we will get along. So when Speaker Boehner tries to save us money and cuts out senseless spending that is not childish, but intelligent.
As a matter of fact it is your partisan buddy that Pundit Harry Reid that acts childish. He kind of reminds me of a 5 year old: “If I don’t get what I want I shut down the Government and blame it on you”.
But then you don’t even understand this principal yourself, right?
By spreading the fear that the Military and retired people would not get paid after a Governmental Shutdown you and Harry Reid used this cheap PR trick to try and blackmail Speaker John Boehner into giving in to your demands.
Be advised Mr. President that this behavior might sit well with your consolidated Liberal Voters, the radical socialists in our country, but WE THE PEOPLE are taking notes and will make sure you do not get away with this.
You have been so spoiled, together with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid as the three musketeers doing whatever you want whether WE THE PEOPLE like it or not, it is time somebody shows you, Mr. President, and your favorite thug Harry Reid your place.
I do understand that you do not want to defund parasitic Organizations such as the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, NAACP, CAIR, Unions and other democracy hating organizations. I truly do understand that because let us take a closer look at them:
Those are alleged Non-Governmental-Non-Profit organizations whose primary source of financial resources comes from Governmental Funding.
80% of all good Americans reject those organizations and what they stand for and yet the very same 80%, and that includes me, finance those Parasitical Institutions against our will through Governmental Funding.
This is Socialist Redistribution 101.
The same organizations, of course, use their Governmental Funding to funnel that money back to supporting you and the Democratic Party through campaign contributions. This is the “Liberal Machine” at work, nice and tidy.
And that Mr. President is the real reason why the funding of those parasites is so important to you. It is all about re-election and not what is good for the American people.
In lame terms, they use my money to support my political opponent. Thank you for the redistribution of my money against my will Mr. President you sure are a professed parade Socialist.
Or as it is called in the language of Criminal Justice – Money laundering!
And since you already announced that you will run a 1 Billion Dollar election campaign you definitely will need that money, right?
1 Billion dollars in election funding – this number alone is obscene.
But then again you are not any different than the socialists in the former USSR. There it was the same, taking it from the people, keeping them in poverty to make them dependable on the government while the politicians lived in an arrogant, egomaniacal dictatorship.
You might have thought with our Budget you could “Rule and Reign” over the peoples heads again just as you, Reid, and Pelosi did on the Healthcare Crime you committed. But this time WE THE PEOPLE have a voice in the congress.
I count the days Mr. President, 654 days left until WE THE PEOPLE have our America back, our Senate back and our White House back.
May God have Mercy for the next 600 days and
Bless the Greatest Nation on the Planet the
United States of America
On Monday March 28, 2011 President Obama addressed the Nation on Primetime television on his Libya involvement. This comes nine days after the missile attacks on Col Muammar al-Gaddafi’s regime by the U.S. Military, France and the UK.
President Obama’s speech, presented as compassionate, left many questions, concerns, and contradictions.
Many key issues the President addressed are not fully answered; contradict the ‘UN Security Council resolution 1973’ (1) published by the United Nations Press center under: ‘SC/10200’ (2), as well as the ‘Geneva Convention from 1949’ (3).
Questions, such as the exegesis of the UN Resolution, continued involvement of the United States, the actual “American Interests” in that region, and the role of Al Qaeda in that conflict.
Not to forget the Constitutional Aspect of divided power and when the President is authorized to interfere in an armed conflict.
There is one thing I agree with the president on and that is that Muammar al-Gaddafi is a dictator, a terrorist, and needs to be removed. But let’s not forget who made Col. Gaddafi respectable in the world.
It was not the United States, but rather the European Union and the United Nations who actually lobbied to provide the very same dictator a seat on the UN Humans rights council.
The very same EU and UN who made Billions of Dollars profit from doing business with this dictator, while the pre-Obama U.S.A. had a ban on this country. And these countries now want Gaddafi to be removed and the United States should do the dirty work.
So the key question to be answered is who is President Obama really serving in this conflict?
The Key issues in a nutshell:
– President Obama declared that he has deployed American Forces after consulting the bipartisan Leadership of Congress.
But the truth of the Matter is that Congressman Boehner, speaker of the House, said on Sunday March 20, 2011 the President better explain what America’s role” is in the Libya offensive before further military action is taken, Politico.com reports (4).
Even his own partisan friends in the House were so surprised that the word impeachment was mentioned by VP Joe Biden and 8 other Democrats (5).
If Obama had really consulted bipartisan Leadership as he claimed in his speech, would the Speaker of the house and the Vice President not have been fully informed and why did the VP talk about impeachment over this action?
– President Obama points out over and over that the American involvement was to protect innocent Civilians, and painted a horrific picture of massacres and genocide.
But here is the thing. The Geneva Convention from 1949 (3) specifically spells out who is protected under their Charta and considered a “Civilian” (Part I, Article 3, (1) In case of conflict of not of an international character…persons taking NO active part in hostilities).
Therefore, armed Rebels fighting the current government in hostile actions are not to be considered Innocent Civilians and Obama’s proud announcement of destroying Tanks moving towards the rebels is NOT protecting civilians under the Geneva Convention, but rather supporting rebel forces.
And what about the civilians still committed to Gaddafi? Think about the Dictator what you want – the women and children still believing in him are still Civilians, are they not protected by the Geneva Convention?
– President Obama mentions several times how he is determined to fight Al Qaeda and he keeps mentioning Iraq.
Either the President is so badly informed or he purposely withholds vital information from the American people.
Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the leader of the Libyan rebels has confirmed and admitted in an interview with the UK Telegraph (6) on March 25, 2011 that jihadists who fought allied troops in Iraq are now on the front against Gaddafi. Mr. Hasidi himself is a member of Al Qaeda and fought against the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Washington Times on March 30, 2011 confirms that Jihadists join Libyan Rebel Forces (9).
Al Qaeda in Maghreb, the African side arm of Al Qaeda, has always been a strong force in that area. They usually move in the no-man’s land between Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt.
To finance their Terror attacks, primarily against the United States, they kidnap preferred European Tourists during a desert trip and demand ransom which is usually paid through Saif al-Islam Gaddafi’s Charity foundation. Another financial source for Al Qaeda in Maghreb is providing Terror camps (7).
– If President Obama is so determined to fight Al Qaeda “wherever they are found”, as he claimed in his speech on Monday why did he announce on Tuesday March 29, 2011 that he does not rule out arming Libyan Rebels (8)?
President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have not ruled out supporting Rebels with arms.
NATO General Secretary ‘Anders Fogh Rasmussen’ already rejected the idea with good reason.
Not only would this practically arm Al Qaeda Terrorists, but in fact this would violate the ‘UN Security Council resolution 1973’ (1).
Chapter 13 “Enforcement of Arms Embargo” does not specify between Rebel forces and Regular Government Forces. The mandate say’s clear to enforce an Arms embargo against the country.
Even if rebel forces prevail and overthrow Gaddafi, it is up to the United Nations first to remove the Arms embargo before any country can provide lethal weapons.
In addition, arming Rebels against the Government would provide a clear advantage over the Government forces and therefore be a direct interference in an inner conflict of a sovereign state, also known as civil War. And let’s be honest this conflict already is a civil war. And this is clearly not in the UN Mandate.
The mandate speaks exclusively about “providing a No-Fly Zone in order to protect Civilians” and rules out a direct interference.
– President Obama did not point out clearly the involvement of ground troops.
As a matter of fact, in several parts of his speech, the president mentioned so called “Search and seizure” as well as “Search and Rescue” operations.
Rescue who, who does the president want to rescue; all Americans are out of the country. Or does the president actually mean “Search and Destroy” missions?
This would make a lot more sense since the President has signed a “secret presidential finding authorizing covert operations in Libya” as U.S. officials confirmed to Fox News on March 31st 2011, only three days after the president announced there will be no ground troops in Libya (10).
There are only two facts that are undisputable and that is 1) Col. Muammar al-Gaddafi needs to go and 2) the conflict in Libya is a internal domestic Conflict also called ‘Civil War”.
No matter how compassionate or whiningly Obama presents the situation a military support is a clear interference in a inner conflict, arming rebels is a dangerous adventure because it also means for a fact arming Al Qaeda.
Again Gaddafi needs to go, but the way to get there is diplomacy and not military action.
If military action is really the answer why don’t we get involved against Ahmedinejad, who poses a way larger threat to the United States and our ally, Israel?
6) UK Telegraph
10) Fox News
The United States is at War again.
On March 7, 2011 – The French and the United Kingdom first pressured for the establishment of a No-Fly Zone over Libya, but backed down. As of this moment the military interference in an internal Conflict, commonly known as Civil War, was on the table.
The Arab league supported this Idea, but never intended to get involved by themselves just in case something went terribly wrong, and in a military conflict there is always a possibility to blame others.
On March 17, 2011 – the Unites Nations Security Council approved, from pressure of the French President Sarkozy, a military intervention in Libya.
“SC/10200 United Nations security council approves a ‘No-Fly Zone’ over Libya’ (1), authorizing ‘All measures’ to protect civilians.
This fungous declaration leaves a lot of room for interpretation and even more questions.
On March 19, 2011 – the First Air Strikes began in cooperation with Missile attacks from U.S. Battle ships.
President Obama has, illegally and without consent, sent U.S. Armed Forces into a conflict. Though he had plenty of time to consult with the Congress and call for an urgent emergency meeting getting Congressional Approval, President Obama decided to play Golf, pick his favorite NCAA team and travel to South America.
This action is not only highly illegal but also endangers American soldiers. Illegal because we have a constitution and the constitution is clear on when, where and how the president is authorized to engage the Armed Forces in a conflict without Congressional Approval.
The War Power Act from 1973 (2), established by the 93rd Congress after the Vietnam conflict was put in place exactly to prevent any U.S. President to engage the U.S. in a War without approval again.
More important than the Power Act is the United States constitution. Article I – Section VIII (3) rests the power to declare War solely to the United States Congress, and requires both the Commander-in-Chief AND the Congress to commit U.S. Troops; otherwise any Action would be unconstitutional.
Article II – Section II (3) of the U.S. Constitution sure identifies the U.S. President as the civilian oversight of the U.S. Military and Commander in chief, but does not allow him to use the Armed Forces to enforce its political will on foreign Nations.
March 22, 2011 – the first American Airplane, an F-15 Strike Eagle, crashes over Libya (4). And despite the statements from the Pentagon that this Jet was ‘Not’ shot down, but crashed due to technical failure the situation remains the same. According to UK Guardian the Pilots could not have known if the people who found them were friendly or non-friendly since they all were heavily armed.
Praise the Lord the Fighter Pilots are safe and well, but it could have been the other way around.
There are many questions that now rise from this situation. Speaker of the House John Boehner sent a few questions to President Obama concerning the American involvement in this “Action” I think he asked the wrong questions. So let me as ask a few here:
My first question concerns the UN Resolution – Gaddafi, Libya and the rebels
The UN Resolution declares “All necessary Measures to protect Civilians”. But what does that mean, who is a civilian in this case and who is a participant in an armed internal conflict.
In my understanding of the Geneva Convention (5) a person that is armed and participates in a violent action is not to be considered an unarmed unprotected Civilian and falls under the rules of Engagement.
Muammar al-Gaddafi should have been taken out 30 years ago. But it was the European Countries, especially France, Germany, Austria, Russia and so on who protected him and made him diplomatically eligible (6).
No matter what one thinks about Gaddafi he is the legal Head of Libya, his citizens have supported him for the past 30 years. Now the very same Citizens rebel against him.
I definitely agree and support the revolution, but this is an internal conflict and when the UN claims falsely that the western alliance is to protect “Civilians” this is a fraudulent inflammatory statement because as I mentioned above armed Civilians participating in a violent conflict are not protected under the Geneva Convention.
So here is my first question – why is the United Nations so eager to get involved in that conflict?
In my opinion the United Nations together with the French and the UK in cooperation with the European Union uses the U.S. Armed Forces to interfere illegally to overthrow a uncomfortable Dictator for economical (in favor of the European Union and NOT the U.S.) and political reasons (to strengthen Muslim radical groupings).
My next Questions go straight to the Situation of the American Soldiers.
The fact that we have never officially declared war on Libya raises many questions concerning the legal status of our Armed Forces.
Many Military experts and the NATO command already warn that, should the rebels not prevail, a Ground Force operation would be the next logical step. Taking a closer look at the fuzzy UN declaration the application of Ground Forces is not being ruled out. And that brings me to the point.
Since when – does the United Nations run our Armed Forces for their advantage? Since when is the UN in charge of our Soldiers? Ok you might say – sure since the UN puppet Obama is president – but where is the Congress on this?
What is the benefit – does that mean we now get access to the oil and gas of Libya or does that mean we spend American Tax Dollars (over 70 Million Dollars in the past 3 days in Tomahawk Missiles) to make sure the Arab league and the European Union gets the financial benefit?
What if – the fighter Jet Pilots would have been shot down, not in friendly but enemy territory? Since Gaddafi already declared that he does not accept the UN resolution, he could have considered the Pilots terrorists, spies, or God knows what and punished them at will, even execution.
What if – we send ground forces into Libya? What is the status of the conflict? Is this a Police Action, a war, an expedition – what?
And the question is not so far off because this question involves the treatment of the soldiers and their families when they come home according to the U.S. Veterans Affairs regulations.
Only Combat Veterans participating in an official declared War are eligible for the “War-veteran-Benefits” (7). Every military person knows that the benefits, retirement, and other social assistance for homecoming soldiers have a specific distinction – Soldiers in times of peace and soldiers in combat.
What happens – to the families of the fallen? Do they receive surviving dependents benefits of a soldier at war or the smaller benefits for a soldier in peace?
Remember we have never declared war officially on Libya.
Remember how long it took to accept the Vietnam Veterans legally as War Veterans? It took until 2003, under the Bush Administration to recognize veterans’ benefits for Soldiers exposed to Agent Orange (7). Or the legal battles on legally accepting the fact that Operation Desert Storm participants had been exposed to Chemical Weapons and grant the benefits for this. And it is confirmed that Gaddafi holds Mustard gas weapons.
What if – those F-15 Pilots would have been killed – what regulation would apply to them and their families left behind, since we are not at War with Libya?
Despite the legal constitutional aspect of Obama’s narcissist lone-ranger actions, where he thinks he can do whatever he feels like, once again I think he has confused his job description with that of a dictator. Here in America we have a democracy, a system with “Checks and Balances” a House body and a Senate body it is not a 1 man show; Apparently Harvard Law School no longer teaches the rules of our three branches of government.
I am sure there are tons of questions that can be asked but those are the ones that burn on my heart right now.
As far as I am concerned – all we can do is pray for our men and women in the Armed Forces for their safe return as they follow their loyal calling as Service members. God bless you and thank you for your service.
Pray that they all return home safe because our President in my opinion has not given any serious thought to this unauthorized action and its consequences.
Mr. President, Mr. Speaker of the House Boehner:
Would anybody please explain this to me or answer my questions? Since I am a citizen and a Taxpayer I am entitled to the answers.
1) United Nations.org Press Release
2) Almanac of Policy Issues
3) Cornell University Law School
4) L.A. Times
6) (The Hypocrisy of Europe…) tclehner.wordpress.com
7) United States Veterans Affairs Department
Jeremiah 5:19 – And when the people ask, “Why has the Lord our God done all this to us?” you will tell them, “As you have forsaken me and served foreign gods in your own land, so now you will serve foreigners in a land not your own”
(From “the Bible”)
In previous Blog posts I have warned over and over about the Islamization of the United States of America and the rest of the free Christian World. Now we are one step closer to that point, and it seems that there is nothing whatsoever we can do. Those Left Wing progressive Leaders, like President Obama, and his Pundits in America and the world are willing to do anything in their Power to give away our great Nation.
The infiltration of Islam, of which I have warned so many times, has not just begun – NO, it is already in place.
For hundreds of years now, since the beginning of the Muslim faith, established approximately around 622 Anno Domini (after Christ) by Muhammad, a traitor and later religious, political, and military leader (Source: Wikipedia: http://is.gd/h0oa5) Muslims have tried to Islamize the world with lethal force.
Beginning by Invading Europe; over and over and constantly failing. Later, in the 20th Century they used Terror Attacks against Europe and the preferred Enemy, the United States of America, whose freedom those radicals hate.
But they have learned their lessons and after several hundreds of years of getting a bloody nose, they finally have figured out how to Islamize the world without a major loss of personnel – through:
INFILTRATON – USING OUR OWN LAWS AGAINST US.
And the concept for infiltration is very simple and all of those groups cooperate hand in hand.
- They have a militant radical group – performing Terror attacks all over the world, recruiting mostly young people out of poor families, filling their heads with hatred against all those who have (Pretty similar to left wing radicals, socialists, and communists). They are lead by highly educated, gifted rhetorical speakers, mostly educated in Europe or the United States, and a Imam filling their heads with justification of their actions based on the Quran, calling it Jihad (Holy War).
- They have Immigrants who live in Europe and the United States, sent by those radical groups to infiltrate the future combatants and keep them as sleepers (Military and Civilian Intelligence Term for people living an inconspicuous life). In the guest country, always available for Demonstrations (allowed under the law), filing law suits for discrimination, as ground work to take over the country. They don’t intend to assimilate at all, and they demand the acceptance of their very own lifestyle and culture. Those are represented by
- Interest groups such as CAIR (a criminal organization under FBI Investigation for funding and supporting Terrorists – and probably not indicted because of Obama and his Friends) and others.
Those groups do the lobbying, hold contacts to extreme liberal Medias, politicians, and use the very same platform for their propaganda. They have usually highly educated and very sophisticated speakers who constantly appear on TV, Radio, or give Print media interviews declaring how misunderstood Islam is. They describe the religion as peaceful and proclaim how discriminatory the guest country is because they dare to demand a proper integration.
Using the media as propaganda machinery and having ultra left wing radicals as lobbyists they are determined to install and integrate Muslim lifestyle. In order to establish this they need to build a shadow society who later can take over the country. One part of this is the Mosques, where they collect inter alia funds, officially for charity in “occupied Palestine and Lebanon” (which is not true since those people are intruders to Israel). In reality those Charity collections are found to finance terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah, and others.
The other part is to fight the legal actions in order to build a shadow society, using our own laws against us, especially in regards to religious freedom and religious rights, establishing themselves as people outside the law, and the legalization of questionable rules and laws such as Sharia Law. And this is in process right now.
But what is Sharia Law?
Basically Sharia Law is NOT a religious book or bible. Sharia (Arabic شريعة Šarīʿa; [ʃaˈriːʕa], “way” or “path”) is more or less a “code of conduct”, a sacred rulebook/law of Islam in addition to the Quran (Source: Wikipedia: http://is.gd/gUrzw).
Sharia determines under which Muslim life is to be conducted, especially the life of a woman, of which are not considered full and free persons under Sharia Law.
Sharia clarifies capital punishment for murder, theft, and a woman’s unfaithfulness. It dictates public conduct for women such as how they are allowed to appear in public and of course their punishment, stoning and public humiliation.
Attention: Though I truly believe all women should watch this video in order to know what is to be expected under Sharia Law. However, due to the graphic and violent nature of this video, viewers’ discretion and caution is advised.
All major religions have their form of rules, as of how the believers should live.
Judaism: Jewish people have their own books of law (Mishneh Tora, Tur, Shulchan Aruch, Mishnah Berurah, Kashrut, Tzniut, Tzedakah, Niddah, Noahide Laws ((Source: Wikipedia: http://is.gd/h0Kji). But never the less Jews living all over the world, while still keeping their traditions, obey and respect the laws of the country in which they live.
Christianity: Before Christ, God gave Moses 653 laws, which included his top “TEN”. Those laws of the Ten Commandments are still imbedded and central to the Christian faith today. In fact they were the driving force behind the United States legal system.
Muslims don’t even think about integrating or assimilating at all. As a matter of fact, if they don’t get their way they even disrespect the voter’s choice on a ballot. And the latest headlines prove that.
- In Oklahoma, during the midterm elections, more than 70% of the registered voters opposed Sharia Law. But CAIR was not satisfied and immediately ran to court. The Obama appointee Judge Vicki Miles-LeGrange, a left wing judge, right away put a hold on that decision (Source: Fox News: http://is.gd/gUkCZ) totally disrespecting the highest authority in this Country – the decision of “WE THE PEOPLE”.
Since when is the democratic decision of the voters, protected by and under the U.S. Constitution, in this country worth less than the will of a minority religious group – or the other way around – since when do we have to bow before the wishes of guests?
- Since this Week TSA has, due to increasing Muslim Terror, established a highly controversial Airport screening where every privacy of American Citizens is absolutely denied and we are about to be molested, and subject to TSA Agents private porn show. But the very same people who are responsible for that increasing security measure – the Muslims – have already and faster than anybody else found a way to avoid that screening. CAIR has advised Muslim woman to wear Hijabs to allow TSA “Enhanced Pat Downs” only on head and neck area (Source: CNSNews: http://is.gd/h0NwP).
Just so you understand: You have no right to escort your kids into the extra room while some possible pervert touches your child everywhere on every body part, American women have to allow some strangers to touch them all over their body even parts that used to be off-limits (such as breasts and between the legs) and those responsible for that get a free pass – calling on their religion.
For centuries, and since the early day of feminism started by “Christine dePizan“ (15th Century) and “Mary Wollstonecraft” (18th Century) women have fought for their equal rights. Now under Sharia Law all that can be considered over.
Sure right now Muslims claim that this Sharia Law will only take place among Muslims. But that is a propaganda lie to calm the feminists and free women down.
In, and all over Europe, Muslims, lead by Turkish Muslims (the strongest Muslim Emigrant group in Europe) demand partially that female teachers in public schools should wear a headscarf in order not to offend the feelings of the Muslim students. So far that demand has not been given in to, but it’s only a matter of time since the left wing liberals in Europe already “don’t see any problems” and thinks that we should be “more amicable to the feelings of Muslims”.
Sharia Law is misogynic and brutal and does not get along with democratic rules of freedom and the American way of life.
In the U.S. only New Jersey has so far had a ruling regarding Sharia Law (Source: Heritage Foundation: http://is.gd/gUkmS). But this situation is like a Wildfire. If the Muslims continue to “press” and get their way in this case they will be able to get a foothold in our United States legal system. Without meeting serious resistance, legally and socially, they will swamp the rest of the country with their demands of their own laws. If we’re not vigilant our blessed United States will begin to mirror Great Britain…Who is the first European Country to install and allow Sharia Law (Source: The Atlantik: http://is.gd/gUjTS).
The constitution of the United States allows us “Freedom of religion,” and as a freedom loving Constitutionalist I truly believes that everybody should be able to pray to whom, and to what they want.
As far as I am concerned one can pray to a broomstick or to Allah I don’t care, I don’t have to socialize with that person. But no foreign religion should force their laws on us. This country was dedicated to God (the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, not Allah) in 1620 on the shores of Massuchusettes as decreed in the Mayflower Compact. Christians built and gave their lives for this land – We are a Christian Nation.
Come over here and live free, and without persecution for your religion but respect the Judeo-Christian Heritage of this country as a leading form of society or simply get your rear end back home where you came from.
Go call your congressman, call your judges, call your local Media, stand up for what we have a FREE AMERICA – home of the free.
We have to stand up today – tomorrow is too late.
May God Bless America
Another great source about Sharia Law: CFR.org (http://is.gd/gUsbt)